Controlled Shipping CS1 and CS2 in San Luis Potosí - RIDYS Group

Automotive Quality Containment: Controlled Shipping CS1 and CS2

Controlled Shipping is the formal containment the OEM imposes when a quality problem persists: in CS1 the supplier performs it, and in CS2 an independent third party approved by the OEM. RIDYS Group runs CS1 and CS2 containments in San Luis Potosí and the Bajío region.

ISO 9001:2015REPSE ARR197/2024Sales: 444 171 45 1418+ years of experienceSLP and the Bajío region

Controlled Shipping CS1 and CS2 in San Luis Potosí and the Bajío Region

We offer Controlled Shipping Level 2 (CS2) as a third party and personnel support at Level 1 (CS1), according to the customer’s requirements, at the customer’s plant. Our own personnel and on-site supervision. We are ISO 9001:2015 certified and REPSE (Mexico’s Registry of Specialized Service Providers) registered.

Request a Quote

We will contact you by email or phone.

By submitting this form, you acknowledge that you have read our Privacy Notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and the Terms of service from Google.

When Containment Stops Being Reactive and Becomes a System

Automotive quality containment starts with understanding that a quality escape is not just a defect: it is the warning sign of a systemic failure.

When an OEM activates Controlled Shipping, the goal is no longer to inspect more. It is to contain the risk, regain customer trust, and eliminate the root cause.

At RIDYS we implement Controlled Shipping Level 1 (CS1) and Level 2 (CS2) under a structured, measurable methodology aligned to the requirements of the OEM.

Difference Between CS1 and CS2

AppearanceCS1CS2
Control TypeReinforced Internal ContainmentThird-Party Validated Containment
Administered byThe SupplierRIDYS, approved by the OEM
ReportThe supplier reports to the OEMThe Third Party Reports Directly
Escalation LevelFirst Formal ContainmentHigh Risk / Loss of Trust
Cost ImpactModerateSignificant

CS1 Protects Production. CS2 Protects Customer Trust.

CS2 specifically requires an independent organization that is technically competent and approved by the OEM.

Case study

Implementation of Controlled Shipping at a Tier 1 Supplier

Industry: structural component of the suspension · Monthly volume: 45,000 units · Critical characteristic: diameter dimensional tolerance · Impact on the OEM: assembly line stoppage

Initial Situation

IndicatorValue
PPM (3-Month Average)1,850
Cpk0.87
Recurring incidents3
FMEA statusOut of date
Risk Level for the CustomerHigh

The problem was not just the defect. It was the failure of the detection system before shipment.

CS1 Activation — Immediate Actions

Segregated containment area · 6 additional inspectors · 100% inspection of the critical characteristic · Double check per shift · Green label identification per lot · Daily review of containment performance

Results at 7 Days

IndicatorBeforeAfter
Internal PPM1,850420
Escapes to the Customer20
Suspect Units Contained—3,780

Root cause analysis

Tools applied: 5-Why analysis, capability study, and tool wear investigation.

Critical finding: progressive tool wear not detected due to insufficient monitoring frequency.

MetricBeforeAfter
Cpk0.871.67

Escalation to CS2

Due to historical recurrence, the OEM required the activation of CS2.

RIDYS as an independent third-party provider · Physical and operational segregation · Parallel inspection process · Direct reporting to the OEM · Daily statistical tracking of performance

Results at 30 Days

IndicatorResult
PPM12
Escapes0
Sustained Cpk1.62
Customer Audit Rating95 %

Final Result — Total Duration of 62 Days

IndicatorBeforeAfter
PPM1,8508
Cpk0.871.62
Customer ComplaintsFrequent0
Supplier StatusAt riskRestored

Financial exposure avoided, estimated: more than US$2.8 million per year.

What a Company Needs to Know Before Entering Controlled Shipping

Controlled Shipping is not extra inspection. It is a structured quality management system for a crisis.

Benefits of a correct implementation: immediate risk containment, elimination of escapes to the customer, rapid PPM reduction, structured root cause validation, protection of the supplier rating, prevention of lost business, and faster restoration of OEM trust.

Who requests and runs Controlled Shipping: the Quality Manager, Supplier Quality Engineers (SQE), and the customer’s crisis management team.

Typical duration

LevelTypical duration
CS130 to 45 days
CS230 to 90 days, depending on severity

Typical exit criteria: sustained zero escapes, stable Cpk above 1.33 or the OEM requirement, updated FMEA and Control Plan, and a passed customer audit.

What Determines the Cost

The cost of a Controlled Shipping program depends on the volume contained, component complexity, number of inspectors required, program duration, and the customer’s reporting requirements.

In most cases, that cost is lower than the alternatives: line stoppages, chargebacks, warranty claims, and lost contracts.

Information and Reports the Program Requires

Controlled Shipping requires structured documentation on four fronts.

Operational report. Daily containment results, defect trend analysis, recorded inspection volume, and segregation tracking.

Statistical report. PPM trend, Cpk monitoring, escape analysis, and root cause validation data.

Documentation update. 8D reports, updated FMEA, revised Control Plan, and Layered Process Audit results.

Communication with the OEM. Daily summary reports, weekly executive status, and a formal presentation package for exiting containment.

Why Controlled Shipping Fails

It fails when it is treated as extra inspection, a temporary labor boost, or an administrative compliance formality.

It works when it becomes a structured quality firewall, a statistically validated containment system, a strategy for eliminating the root cause, and a reputation recovery mechanism.

RIDYS as a Partner in CS1 and CS2

RIDYS has supported Tier 1 suppliers in achieving: a 95% PPM reduction, zero escapes after release, Controlled Shipping closure in under 70 days, and full restoration of OEM trust.

We Don’t Just Inspect Parts. We Stabilize Systems, Protect Contracts, and Restore Operational Trust.

ISO 9001:2015 certification (Orion Registrar, ANAB accredited) and REPSE registration ARR197/2024 with Mexico’s Ministry of Labor (STPS).

Frequently Asked Questions About Quality Containment

What Is Automotive Quality Containment?

It is the set of actions that isolates suspect material, inspects it against a customer-approved criterion, and releases only conforming product while the supplier eliminates the root cause. It covers inventory at the plant, in transit, in storage, and at the customer’s plant.

What Is the Difference Between a Containment and Controlled Shipping?

Containment is the immediate response of the supplier to a quality problem. Controlled Shipping is the formal containment imposed by the OEM when the problem persists or is serious: in CS1 it is carried out by the supplier itself and in CS2 it is carried out by an independent third party approved by the OEM, who reports directly to the customer.

How Long Does a Controlled Shipping Containment Last?

As a reference, a CS1 lasts from 30 to 45 days and a CS2 from 30 to 90 days, depending on the severity. Containment ends when the exit criteria defined by the OEM are met, not when a deadline is met.

What Evidence Does RIDYS Provide During Containment?

Per-shift report with parts inspected, conforming and nonconforming, defect type and location, plus identification of released material. That information supports the exit request to the OEM.

Contact

Request a Quote

Describe the material, the defect, and the volume, and we will send back a proposal with rate, start-up time, and reporting scheme.

RIDYS Group · Av. Universidad 1085, Azteca Norte, 78310 San Luis Potosí, S.L.P. · Phone: 444 171 4514